Sorry that the post needed removing before I got around to posting a reply.
The abusive user was instantly warned by the webteam as soon as the post and complaint were recieved.
Due to the seriousness of the abuse it was deemed that the Abuser would have his posts moderated straight away but for technical reasons that has not worked as it should of done and the abuser was able to post again last night.
Our apologies go to Weeksy for not keeping him informed of this but we were busy searching for a solution - I believe exactly the correct actions were taken but can see why it might be thought we were not taking the event seriously enough - which is certainly not the case.
So, can I ask what someone has to do to be banned from posting?
This is not a loaded question...I'm genuinely interested. Is it mearly down to the WT/MT or is there some system in place...i.e. 2 strikes and your out?
From a personal point of view, I see no reason why the person who originated the message should be allowed to post anymore...full stop.
Are we suggesting that this form of abuse and negativity to others is acceptable?
And, can I ask how are 'contributiors posts' monitored...I mean, is it down to someone reading everything they post before its posted? Are all of their posts held in a quarentine before being approved...what if the person posts when non of the web team are online?
18-Oct-2006, 09:30 
webteam
Linear Mode
