Ducati Sporting Club UK
General Motorcycles only
General motorcycle issues, including non-Ducati, but keep it motorcycles!
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51  
Old 17-Jan-2006, 12:48
TP's Avatar
TP TP is offline
Registered Forum User
MotoGP God
 
Posts: 15,644
Join Date: Apr 2004
Mood: 749 racebike MGP
The FIM computer has some advantages over running the OEM ECU with adjustability etc as far as I understand. I've had this conversation with Neil Spalding as well.
Quote+Reply
  #52  
Old 17-Jan-2006, 13:16
Chaz's Avatar
Chaz Chaz is offline
Registered Forum User
Ducati Corse
Bikes: 916 Strada
 
Posts: 3,844
Join Date: Jul 2003
Mood: www.od2racing.co.uk
Quote:
Originally posted by twpd
There's still the problem of being able to run without the clocks. Who wants to use std clocks when just a tacho is needed? Is there a way of disabling the immobiliser? Steve at Italia in Lincoln wasn't aware of one.

Spoke to John hacket about this on saturday he says that ducati have software to setup/bypass the immobiliser but are reluctant to release it he is working on it.
Quote+Reply
  #53  
Old 17-Jan-2006, 14:48
twpd twpd is offline
Deceased 02/10/2010 - R.I.P.
Ducati Corse
 
Posts: 3,170
Join Date: Feb 2002
Mood: NGRRC Minitwins champion 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by phil_h
So lets add it all up properly then ...
(all contributions gratefully received)

fim u59 = £450 from sigma
race tacho = £200 +
total about £650

clocks = £365 (list ?)
ecu = £100 second-hand ?
pc3 = £200
total about £665

(then add setup costs to either route)

Race tachos don't cost that much. More like about £125 - less again if you buy from Natty.
Next if you get a used CPU then to be sure you will need all the keys.

So..option 1 is about £550.

Option 2 is still £650+ and you still have the problem of what to do if you trash the panel in a crash.

I've been through all the options time & time again. The most risk free option (and TP should understand the thinking behind project risk assessments ) has to be the FIM route.
Quote+Reply
  #54  
Old 17-Jan-2006, 14:50
twpd twpd is offline
Deceased 02/10/2010 - R.I.P.
Ducati Corse
 
Posts: 3,170
Join Date: Feb 2002
Mood: NGRRC Minitwins champion 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by chass
Quote:
Originally posted by twpd
There's still the problem of being able to run without the clocks. Who wants to use std clocks when just a tacho is needed? Is there a way of disabling the immobiliser? Steve at Italia in Lincoln wasn't aware of one.

Spoke to John hacket about this on saturday he says that ducati have software to setup/bypass the immobiliser but are reluctant to release it he is working on it.

interesting - he didn't communicate that to me when I last spoke to him a month ago. I understand Ducati's reluctance tbh if such a solution exists - it would soon become public domain and once that info is out the thieves will use it.
Quote+Reply
  #55  
Old 17-Jan-2006, 14:55
twpd twpd is offline
Deceased 02/10/2010 - R.I.P.
Ducati Corse
 
Posts: 3,170
Join Date: Feb 2002
Mood: NGRRC Minitwins champion 2007
You know, for all the amount of discussion that has taken place here, the amount of research myself and others have done and all the phone calls made, not to mention the time that the likes of John Hackett have put in - the safest, cheapest and easiest option is still the FIM ecu

This is great if you can use it within the DD rules framework - alas for me, I approached the Minitwins organiser/s (Mike Edwards) and was told that the FIM would not be allowed. I preferred to ask rather than just do it and hope not to get caught out. I'd rather not cheat so it effectively rules out the use of an 800ss in Minitwins unless you have very deep pockets.


[Edited on 17-1-2006 by twpd]
Quote+Reply
  #56  
Old 17-Jan-2006, 15:13
phil_h's Avatar
phil_h phil_h is offline
Registered Forum User
Ducati Meccanica
 
Posts: 2,527
Join Date: Sep 2004
Mood: 900,900,851,750,750,750, 600,600,450,350,350,250
Quote:
Originally posted by twpd
You know, for all the amount of discussion that has taken place here, the amount of research myself and others have done and all the phone calls made, not to mention the time that the likes of John Hackett have put in - the safest, cheapest and easiest option is still the FIM ecu

This is great if you can use it within the DD rules framework - alas for me, I approached the Minitwins organiser/s (Mike Edwards) and was told that the FIM would not be allowed. I preferred to ask rather than just do it and hope not to get caught out. I'd rather not cheat so it effectively rules out the use of an 800ss in Minitwins unless you have very deep pockets.


[Edited on 17-1-2006 by twpd]

Agree totally.
Just trying to make 2 points very clear ...

1. Setting up the 620's (or 800's) to race 'properly' is NOT cheap.

2. The DD series are about CLUB racing, so we should try and make sure we all share all our knowledge, and how we got to it.
Quote+Reply
  #57  
Old 17-Jan-2006, 15:25
butch890 butch890 is offline
Registered Forum User
Big Twin
 
Posts: 1,602
Join Date: Jun 2003
Mood: Enjoying Togdom !
I too spoke to jh on saturday about this and he made a very valid point,if you have an off thats not too serious you should be able to repair the clock housing with gaffer or such like,however if your off is bad enough to wreck the clocks you proberbly aint going to restart!
Also in last years racing there was not one case of anybody not being able to race because there clocks were smashed.
food for thought.
Butch
Quote+Reply
  #58  
Old 17-Jan-2006, 15:51
twpd twpd is offline
Deceased 02/10/2010 - R.I.P.
Ducati Corse
 
Posts: 3,170
Join Date: Feb 2002
Mood: NGRRC Minitwins champion 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by butch890
I too spoke to jh on saturday about this and he made a very valid point,if you have an off thats not too serious you should be able to repair the clock housing with gaffer or such like,however if your off is bad enough to wreck the clocks you proberbly aint going to restart!
Also in last years racing there was not one case of anybody not being able to race because there clocks were smashed.
food for thought.
Butch

JH echoes the point I've been making all along and this is the point I also made to Mike Edwards to no avail

As it happens my instrument panel on the 800 waswrecked but, I was able to rescue the internal pcb which, I am going to rehouse in a steel box under the seat. However, as I've not got the red key and only one black key if any component goes tits up then I'm knackered which is why I want to use the FIM.
Quote+Reply
  #59  
Old 17-Jan-2006, 19:23
NBs996's Avatar
NBs996 NBs996 is offline
Registered Forum User
Ducati in my Blood
 
Posts: 4,728
Join Date: Sep 2003
Mood: I love my 996 xxx
Quote:
Originally posted by butch890
I too spoke to jh on saturday about this and he made a very valid point,if you have an off thats not too serious you should be able to repair the clock housing with gaffer or such like, however if your off is bad enough to wreck the clocks you proberbly aint going to restart!
Also in last years racing there was not one case of anybody not being able to race because there clocks were smashed.
food for thought.
Butch

Absolutely right.
My 620 was "rested at the side of the track" twice last year and the clocks weren't even scratched, let alone smashed beyond repair!

In the event of not going for the FIM setup, and not wanting to cough for the software to bypass the factory fitted imobilliser, it seems all that's necessary is stick the pcb in a box under the seat and keep it plugged in.

Are we singing of the same page yet?!!
Quote+Reply
  #60  
Old 17-Jan-2006, 22:17
butch890 butch890 is offline
Registered Forum User
Big Twin
 
Posts: 1,602
Join Date: Jun 2003
Mood: Enjoying Togdom !
Quote:
Originally posted by NBs996
Quote:
Originally posted by butch890
I too spoke to jh on saturday about this and he made a very valid point,if you have an off thats not too serious you should be able to repair the clock housing with gaffer or such like, however if your off is bad enough to wreck the clocks you proberbly aint going to restart!
Also in last years racing there was not one case of anybody not being able to race because there clocks were smashed.
food for thought.
Butch

Absolutely right.
My 620 was "rested at the side of the track" twice last year and the clocks weren't even scratched, let alone smashed beyond repair!

In the event of not going for the FIM setup, and not wanting to cough for the software to bypass the factory fitted imobilliser, it seems all that's necessary is stick the pcb in a box under the seat and keep it plugged in.

Are we singing of the same page yet?!!

unfortunatly not nick,no-one has mentioned about what happens if we need to reboot the sprogler valve at the track,will we need the ducati software or can we just use a size 6 hammer!
Butch
Quote+Reply
Reply
  
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector
Switch to Vertical postbit Use Vertical Postbit

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Recent Posts - Contact Us - DSC Home - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin 3.5.4 - Copyright © 2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - © Ducati Sporting Club UK - All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:07.