 |
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| #11  23-Aug-2011, 10:46 | |||
| |||
| Quote:
Not sure these dyno reports are worth much. I think Neal A said his came out at 50bhp!!!! I hope that dyno is crap otherwise it sounds like Neal would have a fair chance at winning class A on my bike! Last edited by Simps : 23-Aug-2011 at 12:59.  |
| #12 23-Aug-2011, 11:58 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
 couldnt agree more |
| #13 23-Aug-2011, 19:08 | ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
its not about the bhp its the torque neil had 52bhp but the torque was 39 where dallas had 54bbhp but only 29 torque hence no pulling power skids has 60bhp so if it was bhp he would be miles ahead you need plenty of torque  the dyno seems pretty good as mine was 53 at start of season on dave woods dyno and has been thrashed all year and know read 52 on that one plus you have to give 1 bhp eithe way on different dynos Last edited by Senna3 : 23-Aug-2011 at 19:13. |
| #14 23-Aug-2011, 19:25 | ||||
| ||||
| yep, we had the that conversation the other night; how cam timing can lift torq to earlier in the range and make it fatter and longer, hence drive out of corners and quicker off the line one for the winter that one, if class B is the chosen route next year  |
Linear Mode
