Ducati Sporting Club UK
General Motorcycles only
General motorcycle issues, including non-Ducati, but keep it motorcycles!
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 15-Nov-2005, 14:16
Dibble
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by lizzie
I run my (rather sporty!) car on Optimax 90+% of the time. According to the forum frequented by other owners, fuel consumption is about 10% better so it pays for itself anyway.

i think that needs independent verification, throw me the keys over ....
Quote+Reply
  #12  
Old 15-Nov-2005, 14:35
kwikbitch's Avatar
kwikbitch kwikbitch is offline
Registered Forum User
Ducati Meccanica
 
Posts: 2,911
Join Date: Sep 2003
Mood: Smiley and waiting for the sunshine
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve M
Having allways used Shell Optimax petrol I watched Fifth Gear last night as they ran a test on various fuels - normal unleaded, BP ultimate, Shell Optimax etc. While it didn't have much effect on engines in a low state of tune, it did make a difference to high performance engines - an Imprezza got something like a 30 bhp gain.

Steve? Has it made that much difference on the SS? Do you think it really is worth changing?
If it is you might persuade me to think a bit more carefully about fuel rather than just the normal mods that cost you an arm and a leg!
Quote+Reply
  #13  
Old 15-Nov-2005, 14:43
tricky tricky is offline
Registered Forum User
Mille
 
Posts: 310
Join Date: Jul 2004
Mood: Need spares
I used to optimax in a Zx9r and never noticed much difference may give it another go in the ducati.
Quote+Reply
  #14  
Old 15-Nov-2005, 14:48
philthy's Avatar
philthy philthy is offline
Registered Forum User
Big Twin
 
Posts: 1,028
Join Date: Jun 2005
Mood: Can't make me mind up
Don't they reckon it cleans the engine too?

I'm trying it in our 180,000 mile volvo at the moment and recently got 30mpg on a run. Normal is about 22mpg.

Is it just a higher octane?

Phil

[Edited on 15-11-2005 by philthy]
Quote+Reply
  #15  
Old 15-Nov-2005, 14:56
guest1 guest1 is offline
Registered Forum User
Big Twin
 
Posts: 1,173
Join Date: Mar 2008
Once upon a time long long ago, in a not so far away land, there was an oil manufacturer called Smell.
Now this oil manufacturer made a new and wonderful oil that cleaned the engine as it slicked it's way up and down the teeney tiny oilways and crevices.
But the nasty old bits of mucky poo's weren't giving up that easily, they all ganged up together and decided they would sneak past the poor lickle ickle engines oil filter.
But the oil filter was a wise old thing (2000 miles) and was having none of it, he huffed and he puffed and he stopped them in their tracks and said "No Way wil you nasty dirty horrible particles get past me"
And so the dirt was stopped. But....the pauper pressure switch was also under pressure from this build up of naughty dirt, and so the nice man on the bike knew nothing of the commotion until it was too late.
And the Smell oil company withdrew their super-cleany-licious oils, and the nice man rode his norton into the sunset.
The End
Quote+Reply
  #16  
Old 15-Nov-2005, 15:18
monstermob 998's Avatar
monstermob 998 monstermob 998 is offline
Registered Forum User
Big Twin
 
Posts: 1,099
Join Date: Dec 2004
Mood: is it cos i is a bricklayer
i use it occasianally and have noticed a power increase and smoother running-- but also increased engine noise-- i believe this is because the optimax does not deposit as much carbon as "cheaper" fuels and as guest1 added the oils do clean out this carbon as well-- am i right in believing that the engine relies on this carbon build up to a certain degree?
Quote+Reply
  #17  
Old 15-Nov-2005, 16:31
Steve M's Avatar
Steve M Steve M is offline
Registered Forum User
Big Twin
 
Posts: 1,926
Join Date: Jan 2004
Mood: Sans moto
Quote:
Originally posted by kwikbitch
Quote:
Originally posted by Steve M
Having allways used Shell Optimax petrol I watched Fifth Gear last night as they ran a test on various fuels - normal unleaded, BP ultimate, Shell Optimax etc. While it didn't have much effect on engines in a low state of tune, it did make a difference to high performance engines - an Imprezza got something like a 30 bhp gain.

Steve? Has it made that much difference on the SS? Do you think it really is worth changing?
If it is you might persuade me to think a bit more carefully about fuel rather than just the normal mods that cost you an arm and a leg!

Hard to say because I allways use Optimax, but on the odd occasion I've had to put the normal stuff in (like in the middle of Lincolnshire) it doesn't seem quite as responsive.
Quote+Reply
  #18  
Old 15-Nov-2005, 16:39
Ray's Avatar
Ray Ray is offline
Registered Forum User
Ducati Corse
 
Posts: 3,555
Join Date: May 2001
Mood: R U thinking what I'm thinking?......Oh dear!
The big difference between a car like a Subaru WRX ((STI?)and a Ducati is that the car has a knock sensor. If the car ECU detects pinking it reduces the ignition advance and that has a significant effect on power. A Fuel that allows more ignition advance before pinking is gonna produce more power.

AFAIK a Ducati or any other bike for that matter doesn't have a knock sensor?? So the the fuel used cannot have any influence over the ignition mapping/settings.

Ray.
Quote+Reply
  #19  
Old 15-Nov-2005, 17:00
electricsheep electricsheep is offline
Registered Forum User
Big Twin
 
Posts: 1,037
Join Date: May 2003
Mood: Diet
i believe that the WRX also has a turbo, which can vary the boost depending on the fuel (knock sensor again). Not sure of how running a higher than needed octane fuel will boost power, but i could be missing something
Quote+Reply
  #20  
Old 15-Nov-2005, 17:09
Shazaam!'s Avatar
DSC Member Shazaam! Shazaam! is offline
DSC Club Member
Big Twin
 
Posts: 1,167
Join Date: Nov 2001
A Lower Octane Rated Fuel Is Better

The short answer is ... Don't use a higher fuel grade than recommended, you'll make LESS power.

Read your owner's manual and find out what Ducati says your bike's octane requirements are. In a 916 I run regular grade fuel. Ducati recommends either Plus (which is better if it doesn't ping) or Premium grade in a 998.

Unfortunately, each new generation of riders has to learn this. (So you old-timers bear with me.)

Fuel manufacturers are in business to make money and gain market share, so they've played an interesting head game with consumers, especially when they chose the name for different gasoline octane levels.

Quite understandably, many riders believe that higher octane fuels are better for their bikes (and cars) since they are labeled PREMIUM. The logic being that, since it is more expensive it must be somehow better than REGULAR. In reality, the premium label originates from the higher cost to refine it, which in turn results in a higher retail cost at the pump.

Some refiners take a different approach and label their high octane fuels SUPER so that owners will think that these fuels will make their vehicles more powerful. (I'm surprised they haven't tried to call it JUMBO to get you to think you're getting more gas per gallon.) OPTIMAX is a pretty clever name too.

As a result, according to the US Federal Trade Commission, "Studies indicate that altogether, drivers may be spending hundreds of millions of dollars each year for higher octane gas than they need. ... using a higher octane gasoline than your owner’s manual recommends offers ABSOLUTELY NO BENEFIT. It won’t make your vehicle perform better, go faster, get better mileage or run cleaner."

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/autos/octane.htm

The stated role of the FTC is to work for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop and avoid them.

Unfortunately, consumers aren't getting the message.

The fact is, higher octane fuel has no more energy stored in it than low octane fuel. Consequently, it can't increase your engines performance. The octane rating given to fuel is defined only in accord with that fuel’s resistance to detonation - or more accurately - pre-detonation. It has nothing to do with the power it can release.

Engines need a fuel that detonates in a controlled fashion - i.e. burning fast, but not too fast. In an engine that has an increased compression ratio by design, the increased pressure and temperature in the combustion chamber will cause a too-low octane fuel to detonate prior to the piston reaching top-dead-center (TDC). This results in a ping you can hear. This misfire will create forces that oppose the rotational inertia of the crank and flywheel so performance suffers.

Occasional light knocking or pinging won’t harm your engine, and doesn’t indicate a need for higher octane. But don’t ignore severe knocking. A heavy or persistent knock can lead to engine damage.

A proper air/fuel mixture when ignited by the spark plug burns, it doesn’t explode. The burn time of an air/fuel mixture is factored into the ignition timing. That is why timing settings are specified @ BTDC (before top dead center). When the air/fuel mixture is ignited the piston is still on the way up. Because of the piston velocity and the burn time of the air/fuel mixture maximum cylinder pressure is obtained just after the piston passes TDC, giving you optimum power output.

High octane fuel has additives that increase the ignition temperature of the air/fuel mix so it can be used with the higher pressures and temperatures of high performance engines. These additives were initially tri-ethyl-lead that presented health and environment risks so many countries have outlawed their use (with some exceptions for aviation fuel). These additives are intended to actually slow/delay combustion slightly.

Most modern engines are designed with a moderate compression ratio that doesn’t need leaded fuel and will run as well or BETTER on low octane fuel. Remember, it’s easier to ignite a low octane fuel than a high octane fuel and that the higher octane fuel burns slower.

Some engines are designed with high octane fuel requirements. Forced induction (turbo-charged and super-charged) engines have higher cylinder pressures so they require higher octane gas.

Older engines having carbon deposit build-up that effectively increases the compression ratio may require a higher grade gas. Modified or stock engines with high compression ratios above 11.5:1 may need to run a plus or higher grade gas.

Advanced ignition timing results in higher cylinder pressures. If your ignition advance is set too high this will also induce pinging since you are igniting the mix even more before TDC so cylinder pressures rise more quickly as the piston is still compressing and the tendency to detonate is higher. Some automobile engines even have knock-sensor protection to retard timing for this reason.

So what’s the downside of using too high an octane fuel? Higher cost with no benefits is one. Paradoxically, another is that burning higher octane fuel in an engine designed to operate at a lower octane rating can produce carbon deposits secondary to partially unburned (slower burning) fuel. These carbon deposits can build up so as to reduce combustion chamber volume and effectively raise your compression ratio, causing you to actually need a higher octane grade.

The optimum octane rating is actually slightly lower than the manufacturer’s recommended minimum stated in the owners handbook. This is to provide a safety margin in case a particular fuel delivery or brand doesn’t quite reach it's specified octane rating or to compensate for environmental changes. The octane requirement is different depending on the weather and your location.

Modern motorcycle engine management systems adjust automatically to prevent pinging. Variables that affect pinging, such as coolant temperature, ambient air pressure and air temperature, are constantly monitored by the computer to assure best performance.

For example, in the summer when your coolant temperatures run hotter, a water jacket temperature increase of 10 degrees from 160°F to 180°F would normally increase the (R+M)/2 octane number required by 2, which is one gasoline grade higher than recommended. However, the computer has a preset fuel and ignition timing map that tells it to retard the timing to avoid pinging when the temperature is high.

It's important to note that the fuel and ignition map is based on the expectation that you are using the recommended fuel. If you are using a higher than recommended octane fuel, the computer doesn't know and will still temporarily retard the timing. So the computer cannot take advantage of a higher octane fuel unless you reprogram the fuel and ignition map on a dyno.

Pay attention to the rating system specified in the manual. For motorcycles manufactured outside the US, the owners handbook will specify the minimum fuel octane requirement as either 92 RON (US Regular), 95 RON (US Plus), or 98 RON (US Premium.)

The octane rating system is different in the US. When this system is used, 87 (R+M/2) is called Regular, 89 (R+M/2) is called Plus and 92 (R+M/2) is called Premium.

The bottom line is ... for best performance use a fuel rated as close to the manufacturer’s MINIMUM recommended rating as possible. If it pings, try a different brand or use the next higher grade.
Quote+Reply
Reply
  
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector
Switch to Vertical postbit Use Vertical Postbit

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Recent Posts - Contact Us - DSC Home - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin 3.5.4 - Copyright © 2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - © Ducati Sporting Club UK - All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:26.