I would say jhp is not just saying this to sell them!! ( i and a lot of others have bought them from else where)
I know my 999r had a massive flat spot around 7-8000rpm, when i went there once! Sadly im not a racer like you steve (laughs and jokes)

I will post my before and after fuelling maps when i get them....Speak to Dickie and how his 999s ran like a bag of unnoticed spanners prior to PC111 and how it is after......

If Jools had his way we would all be riding 125s and doing CSS all the time.

:lol::lol:

Is it necessary to fit a power commanderto a 996R with termis
Neccessary = Probably not
Desireable = Yes

Is it necessary to fit a FIM chip to a 916 with Termis
Neccessary = Probably not
Desireable = Yes

My 916 fitted with Termis and a Ducati Senna chip is perfectly adequate for the road, although a custom FIM would probably improve it futher I would find it hard to justify the cost and have therefore spent my money on other items for the bike.

Performance bikes 2003 raving about how good the Ducati fuelling is..........

closer..........

i understand all comments for and against a PC. I suspect until JH sees the bike on a dyno then its impossible to say if it needs a PC. When i owned this 996R previously it ran very well, didnt notice any problems with throttle response, but would i notice if the fueling wasnt spot on?

I think the correct way to go with any engine modifying is to check the fuelling is correct after.


I know your going to do what you want to do.......I know the bike wil notice modified, correct fuelling....whether you or i would......................

I had no plans on getting one, just wanted to make an inquiry on other peoples thoughts.

:lol:

:puzzled:

Jeeeeez...

Adam...I think the score is...


performace increase = you won't notice unless someone shows you the dyno.
financial benifit = other options probably more value for money
bike runninhg benifit = if you have a flat spot now, with a 'standard' performance chip fitted...probable improvement with a PC.

Simple.