Jon
I think the MT need to question WHY there was such a poor turnout to consult over this document.
From the one that AK got, I raised my eyebrows just a tad, in suprise that Gizmo had not quite covered items that should have been covered.
Maybe these points were raised by emails tho from members - no doubt you will see them in the next pronto tho
(I have been involved in doing 2 constitutions for a national club and also an International club, so like to think I have a reasonable idea as to what ought to be there
)
Ref the electing of the MT at the AGM (has been mentioned on several threads today) at
present only 3 of the current MT stand down at the beginning of the AGM,(as they are not able to serve more than 3 years without re-election at present) they are then eligible for re-election at the AGM.
Anyone else who wishes to stand has to get their nomination to the MT within a certain time
before the AGM, along with info about how their skills can be of service to the MT in the job.
However, what I cant find (and didnt in 2004, 2005 & 2006), is information as to WHO is going to step down each year, until you actually get the the AGM.
This will prove a bit of a problem for prospective MT members, in not knowing which positions to apply for.
Finally, of the total number on the MT at present there are a couple of people - who having been co-opted since the AGM was held - cannot vote on any issues at the MT meetings.
However, I stand to be corrected about my comments on the above.
C