View Single Post
  #9  
Old 27-Dec-2006, 12:32
twpd twpd is offline
Deceased 02/10/2010 - R.I.P.
Ducati Corse
 
Posts: 3,170
Join Date: Feb 2002
Mood: NGRRC Minitwins champion 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Reed
loads stu !!,thats the trouble,why hasn't the cc limit been raised for all the manufacturers eh ???,as we have said before,Ducati don't need to increase the capacity in order to gain results,as its winning around the world,its supposed to be a level playing field,ain't it!

I've read somewhere ,that jhp,has got a £175k budget,for superstock,for next year,why is that?,i thought the bigger capacity was to reduce engine rebuilds/costs,surely,or,is it going to be that illegal,it needs the re-builds !!!

Ah well,it'll soon be april !

Because it's not a level playing field for a twin. I don't see how this is so hard for people to understand. cc for cc a twin cannot compete with a 4 and the reason for this is that the 4 has more valve area - it is valve area that largely dictates how much power is produced. 4 small high-revving pots will give more power than two large lower-revving pots.

The easiest way to get more power out of a 4-stroke is to increase the valve area i.e the bore and the size of the valves, and shorten the stroke to allow it to rev harder. This is why 4 cylinder bikes make more power per litre than twins.

It's quite amazing that Ducati can compete as they do with the 999 but it costs them a fortune in engines because they don't last long. They want to go to the bigger motor to save money and have restrictions placed upon them re. the amount of tuning they are allowed to do. I get tired of people saying Ducati cheat - they don't. They work within the rules which, have been agreed by all the factories including the Japanese factories. A well-known Yamaha race engineer once said that if the rules were properly applied then the 4's would be restricted to 738cc whilst the twins were at 1000. I will try to find the reference.
Quote+Reply