Quote:
| Originally Posted by 888heaven Only kidding 749er no need to throw the toys at me,I was just making a point that newly converted disciples of what ever religion non smoking converts vegetarians etc seem to get on their high horse and start preaching as though they've been champions for the cause for life when in reality it was yesterday.
your point about the scottish isles just didnt add up if the islands are 100%likely to be under water why build a wind farm there its just that sort of twisted logic I cant get my head round, that wind farm will make no negligable impact to the total Co2 emmisions but will destroy a beautifull island you cant justify one lot of vandilism with another. |
sorry if I sound stroppy, got a lot going on just now. The 9m rise is a possibilty, some models predict a rise of 1m, depends who you believe. This is part of the problem. Most people know something is happening and its not good, its a question of how bad might it be and might it be tolerable?
But interestingly there is a debate going on, on one of the western isles just now as to whether a huge wind farm should be built. One side says its a blot on the landscape the other side says the world needs to act and since the island is part of the world it should have the farm, otherwise no more islands. Perhaps the best place is offshore?
I can appreciate where the opposition are coming from, but personally, I am with Martini. I think the are very graceful objects and I think they represent something clean and positive.