With regard to the crankshaft rule that we have had in the rule book for the 4 previous years, no doubt there are some out there that have already ignored that rule and had work done and got away with it. sadly thats human nature BUT what is it that is now wrong with that rule. Its very clear, its in black and white, easy to understand. So why would we now need to change it. Excuse 1 = Improve reliability = evidence already says they are reliable Excuse 2 = Somebody may have a better one than me = and some probably haven't Excuse 3 = Its good practice = only if the factory balancing is along way out and it costs just to find out Excuse 4 = No Modification doesn't mean I can't modify it = says who I'm sure if I read back through the topic I will come across a few more excuses Checkout the Desmo Due Paddock on Facebook |