My 916SPS is going to Sigma for FIM Chip setup...currently it's got a JHP chip and there's definitely something queer going on (it misfires and stinks of fuel).

R X

Strangely enough my 996R goes on the dyno tomorrow.

Interesting to see what that does in comparison to yours and my previous SPS. Although of course the dyno readings from different dynos always vary a bit, but it will be the same dyno as the SPS went on.

What did the SPS make ?

From memory as the dyno sheets are at home

120 bhp and 71 ft lbs.

in completely standard condition (by that i mean not the road legal pipes):D other than an ITG air filter.

I've heard of SPS's producing more than that but don't know if they were stock, and depends on different dynos a little as well. As you'll know the factory qoute 123bhp for them.

[Edited on 11-5-2005 by BDG]

[Edited on 12-5-2005 by BDG]

Can I say

told you so.....

;)

BTW, it's really hot in Ibiza today....

Felix,

Just getting power and air fuel ratio runs at Jordan bikes. Not somewhere I would use for a serious mapping session, but fine for now.

Ray.

Ray, the latest Power Commander PCIII's have the facility to map individual cylinders. It just needs activating in the software ;)
Maps aren't generally available without dyno runs, but a PC and dyno time should work out cheaper than a FIM unit.

Nelly,

Thanks, I had heard of good results with a power commander but the option to map individual cylinders wasn't mentioned.

Ray

Just come back from dyno run on the 996R

it made 132.5bhp and 72.2 ft lbs torque compare to
my old SPS 120 bhp and 71.1 ft lbs of torque on the same dyno. Having said that the dyno curves on both bikes were pretty similar except that the SPS has a distinct advantage between 6500 & 7500 rpm and the R only really shoots ahead from 8750 rpm in both both powee and torque.

However these figures are qouted on the STD scale which is about 2% up on the EC measurement. The dyno operator always uses the higher reading because it 'pleases' people more.

More realistically different dyno produce different readings so it doesn't really compare with Rays results as i'm sure the 998R engine should produce a little bit more power, unless of course the air filter situation that Ray refers to is having a detrimental effect.

Ray, the map option in the PC doesn't seem to be known about that much. I certainly didn't know it was there until I went on the Dynojet training they offered a few weeks ago.
There's a few hidden tweaks in there to be had, but the installer just needs to know about them ;)
I've had a look in my map library and there are a few maps in there with individual cylinder maps, but none specifically for the R. 998S is covered with a few though.
The latest USB commanders are really clever pieces of kit. The mapping points have been doubled as well as having the tweaks built in. There's also an ignition module coming out soon that allows rev limit tweaking, as well as curve.