![]() |
3 tables, for those interested |
god dom lets hope you mend real soon :lol::lol: |
I think it's a very fair way of doing it, even if no-one else agrees. I'll update it after each round, for those who do find it interesting. I hope I get better soon too... More so in the head, than in the arm ;) |
Quote:
hmmm I think its a good idea. as this should be about cheap fun racing. We got a monster 600 and it would stay standard if I could afford to race it. I hope the big wiggs keep an eye on costs. as the big money budgets will keep winning and ultimatley kill the series.. I hope i'm wrong Age |
Ooo i'm 3rd :bouncy: |
And Ian was really better @ Cadwell Quote:
|
You're right Tonio, dunno what I did wrong there. Updated now, sorry old man :) |
Quote:
3rd in Class and 7th overall, or if it was done under the system I suggested last week under the posts regarding 620 Bigbore kits, then runners would only get half points due to the size of the grid, or classes with less than 10 starters should have a different points scale with a weighting factor or something. A class scoring full points should at least have 10 starters Bit awkward as Andy Johnson diserves full points but it is hard to justify say Ian & Nick being behind Mark & Lin |
Surely the overall table would be the offical DSC table? |
Yet another thought on a scoring system ... there is a classic racing series called the Lansdowne Cup which encourages originality in the bikes by adding and subtracting points ... http://www.lansdowneclassicseries.co...s%20system.htm How about something like : Plus 1 point 583cc Standard cams Standard pipes Standard bodywork Standard tank Minus 1 point : Fuel injection Twin Discs Ohlins |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:04. |
Powered by vBulletin 3.5.4 - Copyright © 2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Ducati Sporting Club UK