Big up to the T8 in BIKE magazine
 

Only beaten to the top slot by the RC45 as the coolest race rep of all time.

Very nice summary I thought - something like "all the 'in your face' presence of a cold war fighter jet"

Cant remember the exact words as I was too tight to buy it !!!

I will reproduce here for you Natt-to save you having to go back to WHS.:lol:

"Father of the 916-and indeed every four-valve Ducati Vee for the past 18 years, including the MotoGP one - the 888 is viciously, completely cool. At the core of its appeal is the look of the thing; blunt and purposeful, like a Cold War jet."

John

*******s! The lot of them, us 851 (well whats left of mine) guys, have got to stand up to the misinformed unwashed masses.
The father, the father, 888 is just a mutated clone. PB got it right at least. And what about the poor old Pantah the great grand father, bet it never got a mention.
Being and old Tornado boy, and have even seen a Lightning in action, I can see the similarities. The 851/888's have less chance of catching fire on start up!
Griff

Might aswell go back to the Cucciolo then.

true!

griff, figured out which clutch plates for the new basket yet,
Rob

Hmm,the RC45 was a cool bike right enough.Think of those great WSB rides by Aaron Slight,Colin Edwards,Foggy and Kockstinki.Then there are all the TT wins by Joey and 'mad' Phil McCallen,......
Yep,awesome bike.
Ya cant say that for many 'Ondas!:lol:

Yeah, but Jools rides a T8.....how cool is that?





















Good job the bike is cool enough to take being ridden by me then really :lol:

Ducati Alloy ones I think.


The RC45 is indeed a weapon. Does anyone remember the TT and the back wheel. Or was that an RC30?

45..robert dunlop...right mess - hes still not right now.

I have the story in one of my old mags
with some pic's
looked bad

yup carbon wheel broke up on him - not very nice

not carbon
Mag

Don't think the RC45 was anywhere near as successful on the racetrack as the 888, was it? And that was despite the millions thrown at it by HRC. Straight from the crate, its handling was considered suspect. Even Hislop didn't get on with it. A 16inch front wheel, and decidedly 'iffy' weight distribution meant cash needed to be splashed on it to make it competitive.

Moreover, with its gaudy multi-colour paint scheme it looks much like any other early '90s pocket-rocket Japanese UJM. No, if 'cool' can be measured by the number of turned heads as you pass by the crowds, the 888SP wins hands down. (IMHO!)

not carbon
Mag

yes, quite correct - not sure what I was thinkin' of, mag marvic of course

Adorning myself with the 'Jacket of Pedantry', or is it the 'Anorak of Minutiae', I can never decide...but first i'm pretty sure the RC45 had 17 inch wheels, it was only the blade that started life with a 16 incher?
And wasn't Robert Dunlop on an NC35, the 400cc little bro of the RC/RVF?

Nah mate.
[anorak mode on]
It was the '94 TT.Robert was on the Medd Racing RC45 when his rear wheel collapsed just after the jump at Ballaugh Bridge.[/anorak mode off]

Sorry RSF, but the RC45's front wheel was a 16". (The RVF400, on the other hand, had a 17").

However, the small front wheel wasn't blamed for the RC45's handling peculiarities. Steve Hislop thought it had to do with weight distribution. Wayne Gardner too said he thought the '93 Factory RVF's (and the RC45) went in the wrong direction as far as engine placement in the frame and it's effect on turning/handling. Even though Honda claimed the engine sits 10mm further forward in the frame (compared to the RC30), both Factory team racers Arron Slight and Doug Polen talked about chasing the front end as it pushed wide, and of its lack of feedback through the turns.

** quietly removes anorak of pedantry and consigns it to the bin. Then grabs outdoor coat and leaves the room **

yup, weeveetwin is right on with this one, the rc45 had 16" front and 17" rear, the rc30 had a 17"x 3" front with a 18"x5.5" rear.