I voted. I always do. It's because my Grandad lied about his age to join up in the first world war, did one of the most dangerous jobs there was to be had as a 'runner' taking messages between various commanding officer in the front line. Then, as now, communication was vitally important and the runners were under constant sniper fire as the enemy tried to stop tactical messages getting through. He did that until he got caught up in a mustard gas attack, it didn't kill him but he got enough of it to get sent home. He was offered an honourable discharge from the army, but once he'd recovered sufficiently he went back to the front line.
Now if someone like my Grandad can make the choice, in the name of fighting fo our freedoms, to go back to the horrors and the hell he'd already witnessed - instead of sitting out the war at home as he could quite legitimately have done - then I'm quite sure I can walk a half mile to the polling station to exercise the freedom that he and millions of others fought to give me.
The trouble with democracy is that, like everything else in life, it's not perfect. Politics, especially at local level, can be petty. At national level it can be very ugly, with all sorts of extremists at the fringe of politics fighting to deny the same basic human freedoms that my Grandad fought for. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely and there are still politicians of every persuasion trying to get that power. Sometimes it's for the right reasons and they genuinely want to serve, but all to often it's for reasons of personal ego and pomposity, or in these days of 'professional' politicians, to sustain their career. The result is the sort of political manoeuvering, deals done in smoke filled rooms, back stabbing and sometimes corrupt sort of politics that we so often see. The whole thing can be a pretty shabby business.
However in my view the main problem with democracy is human nature. There is huge pressure on the political parties to persuade people to vote their way, which translates to aligning themselves with what they hope is the majority of public opinion (which in itself is hugely influenced by a handful of media moguls) and promising that group of people pretty much everything they want. If getting out of Europe (step forward the Rupert Murdoch press) is the main agenda item, there will be a political party promising action. If asylum seekers and immigration is the hot topic (influenced by the Daily Express) once again someone will step forward to promise action.
And what do we do when we step forward to vote? Do we put aside our personal aspirations and vote for the people who have the most rounded agenda for the good of the whole nation. No! Human nature dictates that we vote for the party that promises the most for ourselves. The party that promises to give us what we want at a personal level and aligns themselves best with our own view of the world (however skewed that might be) is the one that gets it.
It's been the same since Roman times "give the people bread and circuses".
: "Jools, get off your soap box and talk Ducati"
Jools: "Fair point rodent"