Quote:
Originally Posted by faith-healer Maybe I over simplified it a bit Chris' and you were reading some thing that wasn't actually there.... Because Diablo's are "very good in the wet" and Rosso's, though far stickier than Diablo's for dry racing, are not reputed to be as good as Diablo's in the wet, my wet/dry senario would seem to be logical. But there again a meaningless quote from an advertising 'blurb' is always better than answering the question posed. |
As far as I see it, the Diablo Rosso is the new Diablo, ie it's replacement.
The standard Diablo was and still is a good tyre,( I use it on the road) the Rosso as it's replacement is more technoloicaly adavanced, offering better grip at higher lean angles in the dry, better wet weather capabilities in removing water from between the road and the surface of the tyre, better silica content etc(this is the one that makes it grip better in the wet)
How do you substantiate that the Rosso is not good in the wet???
" a meaningless quote from an advertising 'blurb "
If as you say the advertising was meaningless, then surley you should complain to the advertising standards agency, as all advertisers have to meet a strict code regarding what they say there product can and can not do, litigation is the modern way of sorting things out.
Before you can quantify that the standard Diablo is better than the Rosso, you need to have ridden/raced them first.
Chris