From memory of when we did a bit of law years ago disclaimers like that have no basis in English law. The garage would still have a duty of care to look after your car.
Perhaps be an idea to get some other opinions before taking it further though!
yes - because the theft was captured on the garage's CCTV (but picture quality was too poor to identify the individuals)! I'm not that bothered about the gearknob or the ashtray that was stolen - but I am about the hardtop as these are quite expensive...
The main issue that I have is that the garage is apparantly able to absolve itself of liability because they say they have signs up that say they are not responsible. I don't actually remember seeing where these signs are so I have to go back (or send a friend there) to take some pictures to see whether they pass any kind of reasonableness test.
But even if the signs were thrust in my face when I entered the premises does that mean they are not liable? My insurance company says that they have not won any cases in this kind of situation so are not going to take it any further unless I choose to claim on my own insurance.
I would like to research if there are any legal precedents for this before I have to dig in my own pocket for solicitors - it's now a point of principle!
Chi, there's a difference between parking outside the shop to go in and buy something, and leaving your car in their charge. I'd take it further, but you might want to ask a professional first!
just re-read my original message and it may give the wrong impression.
I am not trying to imply that the garage or its staff stole parts off my car. The garage is not disputing that a crime took place (the police came to investigate) but they are saying they are not liable for the damage because they have signs up to that effect.
I'm getting a lot of comments saying that the garage is/should be liable but it would be handy to have a comment from someone with a legal background.
A legal liability question 
Hybrid Mode
