Quote:
Originally Posted by Rally 1. 2. Unfortunately point 1 is in direct opposition to point 2. I too am puzzled as to why Henners is being moderated. As far as I am aware, he hasn't contravened any of the listed items in the T&C. I am aware that he is not popular with the MT after events earlier this year. Meanwhile, another member demonstrates flagrant disregard of T&C items 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and possibly 1.5 and is allowed to post un-moderated. The fact that this abuse of the T&C has been directed towards someone else who is not popular with the MT I find 'interesting'. I certainly don't believe this is best left unchallenged, hushed up, done by PM or email, etc. This is a discussion forum, after all, and this matter is definitely worthy of discussion. |
Mike
I've just deleted a long and unwieldy reply I was making. I'll just break it down to the essence.
When free speech is a right, it is the responsibility of anyone using that right to consider the wider consequences of using it. I believe that people don't always take that responsibility seriously enough.
As for the member that was flagrantly abusing the T&Cs, I certainly hope that the WT consider moderation, as those posts were completely out of order.
One last thing, I believe that the Club's reputation is of paramount importance. Short of gross financial mismanagement and misconduct on the part of the MT (for which I have seen no evidence), I feel that continued public criticism of the MT is NOT good for the club. That's what AGMs, EGMs and the process of voting MT members are for, to steer the club where it should be going without dragging its name through the mud.