Is it me, or has the wording on this petition been done really, really badly?
It has no specific aims, except to "allow tinted visors" - but tinted visors are already allowed!
Using words like "requested" and phrases like "cheap and nasty" and "at this time of year" (it's april and cloudy - why would you want a dark visor?) mean it will just be laughed at and binned.
Was this an early April fool? "A rider who is not suffering glare discomfort is more inclined to look longer and more carefully for potential hazards than one that is dazzled. This is perhaps difficult to express in scientific terms. In layman's terms however, it is the difference between taking a quick squint into bright sunlight and thereafter taking a chance on perceived hazards, compared to taking a longer and more careful look with the benefit of a dark visor."
Sorry peeps but wtf. Agree with AndyB - nice idea gone bad.