On a more serious note, having ridden a 999r and a 998r back top back albiet on the road at a moderate pace I find the 999 steers like a 600, very light and flickable but there is less body wieght over the front and I am getting less feel through the bars from the road surface. maybe this is a deliberate trade off flicakbility over maximum lean angle stability??. Personaly I prefer the plugged in feeling on the 916/996/998 to the sitting on top feeling of the 999 but from the 200 miles I have riodden so far I probabley could lap faster on the 999
Originally posted by vman1000cc When your pushing the bike to its limit, wobbling down to the shops to get a pint of milk, that 999 front end can wash out on you at any moment...
Well If Sean Emmett gets injured , at least they can call upon Triple Nine, with his Racing Prowess and set up-abllity.
Maybe we should start calling Triple Nine the "Doctor" Move over Rossi..
I read somewhere a little while ago about the weight bias of the 999 favouring the rear more when compared to a 998 race bike, which itself carries a fair bit more forward bias than a road going 998R, as well as having a different trail figure. Although the set up of the 999 for the road appears to be quite good if it had a extra 40 to 50 bhp pushing from the rear it could well start to show some short comings in its setup, just like a 998R would. I would be interested in Lapmans view of his 998R when ridden as standard and then after fitting the longer mag arm, mag yokes etc.
will let you know how i get on with my 999R more specifically how it compares to my old 998R and 996R. i had a stock 999 for a day last summer when my 998R was being serviced and it out handled my bike in everyway amazing, hence me changing to a 999R