 |
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| #2  28-Jul-2004, 21:56 | |||
| |||
| Well, if you believe their financial figures at the end of that report, they are now saying that not only does it not reduce casualties, they're not making any money either!    |
| #4 28-Jul-2004, 22:11 | |||
| |||
| I can't think about this one anymore otherwise my blood pressure will go sky high! Let's see. In a year, they spent just over a million quid on 18 fixed cameras and 4 mobile vans. Presumably that doesn't include the purchase of the cameras since they won't have been installed this past year. What a joke! Then they put into places where they shouldn't have been according to the police. Presumably, they put them in positions for best revenue opportunities. And still, they only made £70!!?? Your tax money at work, folks! |
| #6 29-Jul-2004, 07:50 | ||||
| ||||
| As a rep I visit Norwich twice a month, as you drive into Norwich there is a speed camera, whats wrong with that you think, it is positioned in a bus & cycle lane   , going UP a hill, cant see it catching many cyclists or buses. Who ever thought of putting it there must be realy thickChris.  |
antonye
Linear Mode
