 |
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| |
 14-Sep-2006, 23:33 | #1 |
| Registered Forum User Big Twin  Posts: 1,956 Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Normally in my own little world Mood: I own a flame thrower Mmmmm interetsing comments. I agree with your comments on the whole stainless and mechanical way to go. Also agree with the older watch being better. At the moment, I wear a new ish (18 month old) sea dweller for every day wear, not as many around as the submariner and less obvious as it does not have the cyclops eye. Like em or hate em it's like having money in the bank. I bought it new with a discount  and now that list prices have gone up I know I could get all my money back on it if I decided to sell it. For best, I wear an Omega wind up moon watch, unfortunatley it's only around 4 year old. Will not hold the same value as a Rolex, but, love the history and build quality of the watch. Now if you could track me down a good quality moon watch from around 1969 ..... that would be interesting. | |
| 15-Sep-2006, 00:13 | #9 | |
| Registered Forum User Big Twin Posts: 1,956 Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Normally in my own little world Mood: I own a flame thrower Quote:
I know what they are and yes they are nice. Similar reason why I have a sea dweller. Stainless with black face, black bezel and no cyclops eye. Not an obvious rolex, I like that.Put my name dowm on the waiting list for a stainless Daytona, due in about 3 years now  not as bad as some, local goldsmiths have a 10 year waiting list and have stopped taking names.Not sure if I will keep it or just turn it over for a profit. | ||
Hybrid Mode
