Totally agree with you martin, I've always maintained that every member should be listened to and have their ideas/concerns considered regarding the racing. As for voting rights... not sure on that one... probably the educated opinions lie almost entirely within the paddock, therefor leaving a vote about the rules (for example) open to the membership could easily yield the wrong result. The other bit you're talking about is transparency - I'm with you on that one too.
Totally agree with you martin, I've always maintained that every member should be listened to and have their ideas/concerns considered regarding the racing. As for voting rights... not sure on that one... probably the educated opinions lie almost entirely within the paddock, therefor leaving a vote about the rules (for example) open to the membership could easily yield the wrong result. The other bit you're talking about is transparency - I'm with you on that one too.
Nick - I have no interest in voting or the rules - it's not my place and I'm a dumbo who wouldn't understand them anyway, but transparancy - that's important.
Totally agree with you martin, I've always maintained that every member should be listened to and have their ideas/concerns considered regarding the racing. As for voting rights... not sure on that one... probably the educated opinions lie almost entirely within the paddock, therefor leaving a vote about the rules (for example) open to the membership could easily yield the wrong result. The other bit you're talking about is transparency - I'm with you on that one too.
25-Sep-2006, 18:01 
MJS
Hybrid Mode
