Ducati Sporting Club UK
DesmoDue - General Questions and Chat
Discussions on the race series devised and supported by the DSC.
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 14-Jan-2009, 20:16   #1
nogaromill998 nogaromill998 is offline
Registered Forum User
Mille
nogaromill998's Avatar
 
Posts: 360
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pakenham, Suffolk
Not at all Tim, cheating should not be allowed. My understanding of the rules is that no mods are allowed to the crank, and as far as I can see balancing a crank is merely good practice, not cheating in anyway, as I have already said, it is absolutely bog standard in everyway, with no performance enhancement inferred or gained from just putting the thing together properly. I handed them a crank, 3 sets of rods and pistons and gudgeon pins, circlips piston rings etc and told them to balance the thing.
Reply
Old 14-Jan-2009, 20:25   #2
Rattler Rattler is offline
Registered Forum User
WSB Hero
Rattler's Avatar
 
Posts: 8,863
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boys Town
Mood: www.cantbearsed.co.uk
Quote:
Originally Posted by nogaromill998
Not at all Tim, cheating should not be allowed. My understanding of the rules is that no mods are allowed to the crank, and as far as I can see balancing a crank is merely good practice, not cheating in anyway, as I have already said, it is absolutely bog standard in everyway, with no performance enhancement inferred or gained from just putting the thing together properly. I handed them a crank, 3 sets of rods and pistons and gudgeon pins, circlips piston rings etc and told them to balance the thing.

No issues with the crank - but it sounds like Class B is the new Class A with a selection of engine parts available to create the best engine - nice work.

Part of the challenge and enjoyment for me of DD was creating and building a bike that was within the rules, but took advantage of any available advantages that could be had by applying the rules. Sounds like you've done that with the crank, by using OEM parts that best match (without any machining) to run as efficiently as possible.

My point was about the wheels, if riders are cheating (knowingly or otherwise) by using illegal wheels then they should be protested, or better still, a quiet word should be had with them to point out that they are outside of the rules if they don't run a 583 or 620 OEM wheels. Then they avoid getting protested (and paying out £s) and also avoid getting black-balled by the rest of the paddock.

Maybe its time to plan and run an early "this is what you can do to a DD bike and this is what you can't" session.

Or maybe as part of a FAQ list in the DD section?

Tim
Reply
Old 14-Jan-2009, 20:28   #3
Lily Lily is offline
Registered Forum User
Ducati in my Blood
 
Posts: 4,527
Join Date: Apr 2003
Mood: stiff and tired
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rattler
No issues with the crank - but it sounds like Class B is the new Class A with a selection of engine parts available to create the best engine - nice work.

Part of the challenge and enjoyment for me of DD was creating and building a bike that was within the rules, but took advantage of any available advantages that could be had by applying the rules. Sounds like you've done that with the crank, by using OEM parts that best match (without any machining) to run as efficiently as possible.

My point was about the wheels, if riders are cheating (knowingly or otherwise) by using illegal wheels then they should be protested, or better still, a quiet word should be had with them to point out that they are outside of the rules if they don't run a 583 or 620 OEM wheels. Then they avoid getting protested (and paying out £s) and also avoid getting black-balled by the rest of the paddock.

Maybe its time to plan and run an early "this is what you can do to a DD bike and this is what you can't" session.

Or maybe as part of a FAQ list in the DD section?

Tim

ok... two questions..

how can you tell the difference in the wheels - is it obvious for numpties lke me?

second - I assume the wheel I got from you was kosher
Reply
Old 14-Jan-2009, 20:31   #4
Rattler Rattler is offline
Registered Forum User
WSB Hero
Rattler's Avatar
 
Posts: 8,863
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boys Town
Mood: www.cantbearsed.co.uk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily
ok... two questions..

how can you tell the difference in the wheels - is it obvious for numpties lke me?

second - I assume the wheel I got from you was kosher

I think its more of a 583 thing? But could be wrong. As the earlier wheels were a lot heavier than the later 620 Monster and Sport ones. I only ran 620 wheels on my 620 ( I don't know if the 916 type are any lighter than these anyway) - so the one I sold you is fine as its an original 620 wheel.
Reply
Old 14-Jan-2009, 20:39   #5
nogaromill998 nogaromill998 is offline
Registered Forum User
Mille
nogaromill998's Avatar
 
Posts: 360
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pakenham, Suffolk
As far as I am concerned I have no truck with cheating. As far as I am aware I have neither broken nor infringed any rules, neither have I gone against the spirit of DesmoDue. To harp on about keeping costs down is just nonsensical when you permit the use of plenty of non standard parts. EVERYTHING in my engine is standard, and within factory tolerance, as it was last year and will be next year. What I have had done is good assembly practice, no more no less.
Reply
Old 14-Jan-2009, 20:41   #6
vespa vespa is offline
Registered Forum User
Mille
Bikes: Super Twin 800; DD B; S2R 1000
vespa's Avatar
 
Posts: 177
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bristol
Mood: DD class B
Quote:
Originally Posted by nogaromill998
Not at all Tim, cheating should not be allowed. My understanding of the rules is that no mods are allowed to the crank, and as far as I can see balancing a crank is merely good practice, not cheating in anyway, as I have already said, it is absolutely bog standard in everyway, with no performance enhancement inferred or gained from just putting the thing together properly. I handed them a crank, 3 sets of rods and pistons and gudgeon pins, circlips piston rings etc and told them to balance the thing.

That's what I understand. It's like putting balancing weights to the wheels then
Reply
Old 14-Jan-2009, 20:43   #7
nogaromill998 nogaromill998 is offline
Registered Forum User
Mille
nogaromill998's Avatar
 
Posts: 360
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pakenham, Suffolk
Very good analogy Alex, you are adding material there but it gives no performance advantage, just makes the wheel run correctly.
Reply
Old 14-Jan-2009, 20:58   #8
DSC Region Organiser skidlids skidlids is offline
MotoGP God
skidlids's Avatar
 
Posts: 18,275
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oxford
Mood: Its ONLY a Bike Club
But the wheel is not modified in any way by adding weights, it is just balanced and yes the same can apply to a complete crankshaft assembly, in that you can mix and match rods pistons etc to balance a crank without having to modify the crankshaft.
But few people resort modifying by drilling or grinding their wheels to acheive balance.
So back to the rule, it says No modification of the Crankshaft, It does not say no balancing of the crankshaft asembly by selecting matchingcomponents

As for 916 wheels as far as I know a 916 front wheel is no different from a 620 front wheel and as the rule says
1.6.5 Wheels

Wheels including diameter and rim width must remain as originally produced by Ducati since 1992 for the 600/620 bikes.
Front wheel 17” X 3.5”, Rear Wheel 17” X 4.5”

There is no issue with using a 620 front or rear wheel in a 583 and if the 748/916 front wheel is the same part as a 620 it can also be used.
Did they fit any 620s with 5 spokes as found in the 996, if not then I doubt these would be allowed


Checkout the Desmo Due Paddock on Facebook
Reply
Old 14-Jan-2009, 21:08   #9
DSC Member paynep paynep is offline
DSC Club Member
Ducati Meccanica
paynep's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,081
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Alton
Mood: Wet wet wet
Quote:
Originally Posted by skidlids
Did they fit any 620s with 5 spokes as found in the 996, if not then I doubt these would be allowed

Nope, not even the Capirex as standard - I've already checked.

Mind you, there are mag wheels listed in the DP catalog as suitable for the 620s - surely that complies with "originally produced by Ducati since 1992 for the 600/620 bikes.
Front wheel 17” X 3.5” " ?? Then I figured the 500quid would be better spent on improving ability through tracktime or Magners. Guess what I chose?


Paul

15th year in DD #68 and getting slower by the year

1199, SS800 & 620SSie DD racer
Reply
Old 14-Jan-2009, 21:16   #10
DSC Region Organiser skidlids skidlids is offline
MotoGP God
skidlids's Avatar
 
Posts: 18,275
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oxford
Mood: Its ONLY a Bike Club
Quote:
Originally Posted by paynep
Nope, not even the Capirex as standard - I've already checked.

Mind you, there are mag wheels listed in the DP catalog as suitable for the 620s - surely that complies with "originally produced by Ducati since 1992 for the 600/620 bikes.
Front wheel 17” X 3.5” " ?? Then I figured the 500quid would be better spent on improving ability through tracktime or Magners. Guess what I chose?

Drinking Magners while riding around a track by any chance
Would explain a few things

Maybe the wording should be changed to "originally fiited by Ducati since 1992 for the 600/620 bikes


Checkout the Desmo Due Paddock on Facebook
Reply
Reply
  
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector
Switch to Vertical postbit Use Vertical Postbit

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Recent Posts - Contact Us - DSC Home - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin 3.5.4 - Copyright © 2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - © Ducati Sporting Club UK - All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:34.