Pirelli sign a letter of agreement stating that the tyres in the DD regulations are suitable for the use that we put them to. And as Paul mentioned no other company was prepared to sign one based on a one tyre rule for both wet and dry In the first year of DD 2005 we didn't find out what make of tyre we were using until Feb 15th so anybody that had managed to sort their bike out by then had to use what ever they had to hand for practice.
So far we have had 4 successful seasons on Pirelli, shame we don't still get a set or two to give away as prizes at each meeting as we did in 2005, but then I'm not suprised considering the amount of posts that went up questioning why we were using Pirellis during the end of the 2005 season and the start of the 2006 season.
[quote=NBs996]Last years trophies were not cheap plastic things, they were excellent quality proper metal ones... I know this!
i second that there quolity its funny how people who dident get any seem to moan about them pirreli diablos are awsome tyres i wouldent race on out else speacialy in the wet .
Last years trophies were not cheap plastic things, they were excellent quality proper metal ones... I know this!
i second that there quolity its funny how people who dident get any seem to moan about them pirreli diablos are awsome tyres i wouldent race on out else speacialy in the wet .
I dont think anyone was moaning Kev, just that someone asked what the series DOES get out of Pirelli in terms of sponsorship thats all.....so I gave the answer that CB gave me....
Last years trophies were not cheap plastic things, they were excellent quality proper metal ones... I know this!
i second that there quolity its funny how people who dident get any seem to moan about them pirreli diablos are awsome tyres i wouldent race on out else speacialy in the wet .
If anyone has a spare trophy they don't want I'll take it off your hands
Sadly they don't grow on Trees I could do with a Class A one to add to my Class B and Minitwins ones but I can't see me getting one Bikes not quick enough and neither is the rider