 20-Oct-2006, 00:11 | #25 |
Quote: | Originally Posted by Ian Wooahhhhh, - so where the hell does that assumption come from???
The MT acts as one body (or at least it should). Part of the campaign against the MT was an accusation that the club was run by one person which was complete rubbish.
Individual management team members have no power except where delegated to act. We are a unit; a group, we follow democracy. You cannot have a club run by an individual, - well actually you can, but it becomes a dictatorship. | Fair comment Ian - out of interest then, was the decision by the MT to not allow Henners to rejoin the DSC a unanimous one. Was it a 7-1 vote, 6-2 etc (I can’t remember how many MT members there are). I’m not interested in who voted what just the spilt (if there was one). Even the condemned man faces his jurors and is told whether a guilty verdict is unanimous or a majority vote. Please do not say this information is confidential as this request is a clear test of whether this spirit of openness and transparency is real or the MT are paying lip service to the DSC membership? |
Threaded Mode